Monday 30 July 2012

An Ode to Marina and the Diamonds

By Claire, Devonne and Rayna

Before we begin our ode to Marina and the Diamonds, we first want to have a small ode to our feminist friend Rayna. Rayna is funny, smart, opinionated and she is co-writing this post as a guest-blogger! Welcome Rayna!

So who exactly is Marina and the Diamonds and why is she so awesome? Well, she’s Welsh, she’s a pop artist, she’s awesome, she’s got a beautiful voice, she’s a talented song-writer, she’s awesome, she’s super stylish…have we mentioned she’s awesome?  Have you noticed that we’re saying “she” and not “they? If you thought this was a band, don’t worry about it. Many a poorly informed music reviewer has made this mistake, much to our dismay. “She” is a solo artist and her full name is Marina Diamandis. “The Diamonds” refers to her fans (which mean we’re Diamonds.Obviously). We’ve been following her career since her first album, The Family Jewels, debuted in 2010. Now, two years later, she’s released a new album, Electra Heart. Which we absolutely adore.

Musically, Marina has been compared to many artists, including Katy Perry and Lana Del Ray. While Marina’s music can match other popular artists in being fun and catchy, her lyrics are intellectual and witty in a way that is hard to rival. The subject matter of her songs ranges from the American Dream, to love, ambition, and our personal favourite topic  - feminism. It’s a little deeper than “We danced on table tops and we took too many shots”. And it’s not just that her lyrics can be interpreted as feminist. Marina actually says she’s a feminist, a very rare statement for anyone in today’s pop culture. In an interview with UK magazine Company, when asked if she sees herself as a feminist Marina responds with “Yes...everybody thinks it’s about hairy legged women who hate men. But it’s not”. Contrast that with Ellie Goulding’s response in the exact same magazine where she states “No...I don’t give a shit if an artist is male or female, as long as the music is great. But I don’t think that’s being a feminist, I think that’s about equality” (Ellie please be directed to blog post one where we define feminism). Feminism has such a negative connotation that most people state they’re not a feminist as quickly as possible. For Marina to openly say she’s a feminist and actually understand the meaning of the word, is a breath of fresh air.

One of our favourite songs from Marina’s new album is “Sex, Yeah”. It sounds like it would be a vapid and shallow song, but it’s actually a comment on raunch culture and the gender stereotypes prevalent in Western society. Her lyrics lament that “nothing is provocative anymore, even for kids,” while telling us to “question what the TV tells [us]...question good and question bad”. While we are often taught to be critical thinkers, this message doesn’t usually come from pop songs. The chorus questions gender roles, wishing that “history could set you free from who you were supposed to be” and that “sex in our society didn’t tell a girl who she would be” . We could continue analyzing every line in this song but it’s probably best if you just listen to it yourself.

Seriously. Go to youtube. Now. Also while you are there take a couple minutes to watch one of her satirical music videos. We recommend “Hollywood”,  “Oh No!”, and “Primadonna”.

We live in a society where pop stars are common role models for young girls. And while that may be an issue in itself, if you’re going to look up to a pop star, Marina, with her confidence, intelligence and outspoken feminism, is a pretty good choice.

Why London 2012 Matters for Women


by Claire

For the first time in the history of the Olympics, every country has sent both female and male athletes, and all sports are open to both men and women. This is a historic moment for female athletes, showing both how far we have come, and how far we have to go. 
The last holdout countries were Brunei, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. After a veritable amount of international pressure including suggestions that should they not send female athletes, their male athletes should be disallowed from competing in the games, every single country has complied, though with the stipulation of a number of restrictions being placed upon the female athletes (that do not apply to male athletes.)
Women athletes from Saudi Arabia (which was the last country to agree to send women, a decision made only a few weeks ago) agreed only under the stipulation that women would wear clothing complying with Sharia law (basically everything except the face, hands and feet covered,) they require permission of their male guardians, who must travel with them, and they are not allowed to associate with men other than their male guardians. Yes, these restrictions stem from the religious culture of the area, and we live in a time where we aim to respect all cultures, but it should be pointed out that at one time Western culture was also sexist. Fortunately, we’ve (mostly) moved past that, at least to the point where women can compete at the Olympics in all of the same events as men, without debate. 
While these restrictions are blatantly sexist, and it is deplorable that it took 112 years from the time women were first allowed to compete for this moment to come, it is a reason to celebrate, for women everywhere, not just in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Brunei. 
Unfortunately, many female athletes are invited to the Olympics on “wild card” invitations, rather than actually qualifying for the events. While the does kind of seem like we’re just placating gender equality activists by just putting women into the Olympics who have no real hope of placing anywhere noteworthy, it is important to bear in mind that many of these women come from places where there are so many barriers to them participating in sports that it is impressive for them to have made it as far as the Olympics. Having female athletes compete, even if they finish in the very last place, minutes after the next competitor, will only help to allow other girls and women to compete and participate in sport, both team and individual. They may finish dead last, but that athlete could be a hero in the eyes of so many little girls who need to be shown that it is okay for them to kick a ball, or to run for miles, despite what their culture may tell them. 
The Olympics do not come without their problems. There are politics that get in the way, corporate sponsorships that give unfair advantages to some athletes (ahem, Michael Phelps) and while others live in poverty, there is the sexualization of female athletes, and a host of other problems. But at the very heart of the Olympic games is the fostering of international relations, cooperation and friendship, the celebration of human athletic achievement, and a little (or a lot) of healthy competition. One only needs to looks at the face of the Qatar team’s flag bearer (one of the first female athletes from that country) and the hundreds of other athletes as they walk into the stadium during the opening ceremonies, to understand this. 
Victories during the Olympics come in big and small sizes. For some athletes, it is simply the ability to compete in state of the art facilities, which are distant dreams back home. For others, it is achieving a new personal best in their sport. Representing their country on an international level. Meeting new people and learning new ideas. Inspiring Olympic dreams in young athletes. Encouraging someone to take up a new sport. For a select few, setting a new world record. The massive steps towards the universal inclusion of women in the Olympic games is a big victory, one that should be celebrated everywhere. 

Sunday 22 July 2012

Why You Should Go See Brave!


By Devonne and Claire

Recently, we went to see the new Disney Pixar movie Brave. In case you live under a rock or you hate cartoons, Brave is about a Scottish princess, Merida, who is more interested in honing her archery skills than learning how to make tapestries and meeting potential suitors. She constantly deals with pressure from her mother, Elinor, to become more of a lady so that she may one day fulfill her duty of marrying on of three appropriate political matches. Throughout the film, she struggles between being herself and being who her mother wants her to be. In the end, (SPOILER ALERT) her family comes around, and they convince the leaders of the other 3 clans that all of their children should be able to marry whom they want, when they want and IF they want. 

Though Disney movies are notoriously bad for having weak female characters, Brave is a rare exception to not just movies created by Disney, but to the majority of films. The fact that so many articles and so much discussion has revolved around Brave just goes to show how lacking our culture is in portrayals of strong women. Brave is newsworthy because it’s different. What makes Brave so unique? Brave is a princess movie, but she definitely doesn’t fit in with Snow White, Cinderella or the other princesses known for their passivity, beauty or domestic abilities. Merida has a personality, she has a voice and she has interests and passions. This shouldn’t be a big deal (after all, girls in real life have all these things) but it is. And not only is Brave different in characterization but it drastically differs in plot line for a “princess story”. We kept expecting that Merida would end up with a guy even it wasn’t one of the suitors. But (SPOILER ALERT), she doesn’t. There is no fourth guy, no alternate prince charming. At the end of the film Merida is a single lady. She’s happy without a happily ever after marriage. Which is an excellent message for younger (and older) girls and women. 

This movie is also different from others in that in displays the relationship between a mother and daughter. Often times, in movies such as these, the mother is absent, usually long-dead. Think about it. Ariel- no mother. Cinderella- no parents (just an evil stepmother). Belle- no mother. Jasmine- no mother. Pocahontas- no mother. Even the princesses who did have mothers (Sleeping Beauty, Mulan,) the relationships between them are never a focus or even an element of the story. These princesses live in worlds of male power where a major source of conflict stems from them disobeying their fathers. In Brave, the main focus is the relationship between Merida and Elinor, and the conflict that stems from their vastly different views on Merida’s future. Elinor is constantly trying to make Merida into more of a “lady,” while Merida continuously defies her mother’s wishes. In the end, their differences are reconciled, and neither was fully right or wrong. Yay for grey area!

One of them many articles written on Brave was an EW piece discussing Merida’s possible lesbianism. Um what? There is absolutely nothing in this film that indicates this. There also nothing that confirms her heterosexuality. Her sexual orientation is not an element of this film because there is no romantic storyline. What is problematic in the EW article is not that she might be a lesbian but that the proof for her being a lesbian is that she doesn’t embody traditional femininity. Entertainment blogger Carina Mackenzie put it best on twitter when she said “there is no indication in the movie that she is attracted to women. That is the criteria for a girl being gay. Not being into into archery, or not wanting to marry an idiot." 

Though we loved this movie, we were left wondering if we were 5 year old boys, would we want to go see this film? We don’t really have an answer (maybe because we are not, have never been and never will be, 5 year old boys) but we would speculate that they would not be enticed to go see a movie that is largely about female bonding and conforming to traditional femininity. While the larger issue of conformity vs. individuality does apply to boys we’re not sure if the way it is presented in this film will appeal to a young male audience. One of the problems we see in the film industry is that there is a universal assumption that while girls will go see movies centred around boys, boys will not go to a movie featuring a female protagonist. What was so great about The Hunger Games is that men and women were going to see a movie centred on a female. We are just not sure that Brave accomplishes the same thing for its audience. 

One other critique we would have for this movie (and many of the other few movies and books that do portray strong female characters) is that Merida is what our society would call a “tomboy.” Rebelling against gender stereotypes is awesome and there is nothing wrong with the fact she would rather ride her horse than go on a date. However we take issue with the fact that she is a “strong female character” because she is more traditionally masculine. While we’re glad that we (finally) got to see a princess who doesn’t need Prince Charming, we wish that we could relate more to her. Personally both of us possess more traditionally feminine qualities. We like to wear dresses, we don’t hate the colour pink, and we’d rather take dance lessons than play sports. That doesn’t mean that we aren’t strong women, just as women who are more stereotypically masculine are not automatically strong. There are plenty of little girls who are “tomboys” and we’re so happy that they have representations that they can relate to. But we feel like this particular portrayal has been done before (though admittedly not enough) and we’re still waiting for a strong a female character we can relate to. You can paint your nails while still having opinions. 

If none of the above reasons have convinced you to go and see Brave, we have two more. One, it’s legitimately a good movie; it’s funny, it’s scary (to Claire anyways,) it’s heartwarming, and the body proportions are comically unrealistic. Also, Merida totally looks exactly like Devonne, which is super cool. 

Sunday 8 July 2012

Twittering Feminists

Sometimes things make us mad, or get us excited, or there's links we want to share but we don't have enough to say to write a whole blog post. Sometimes we just want to have a mini 140 character rant. So we started a twitter! If you're on twitter and like our blog you can follow @feminist_issues.

Monday 2 July 2012

No One Asks For It

By Devonne and Claire

photo from http://www.yegslutwalk.com/background/


Slutwalk is a protest that was started in 2011 against victim blaming. In January of last year, a Toronto police officer told a group of women that to avoid being raped/sexually assaulted they should "avoid dressing like sluts to in order not to be victimized." Understandably, a few women (all over the country and world) were less than impressed, and decided to take a stand against the tendency in our culture to focus on the behaviour of the victim(s) rather than that of the offender(s). Slutwalk, in it's short history, is a movement that has spread to nearly sixty cities all around the globe.
The 2012 Edmonton Slutwalk is happening on Saturday July 7th, at the Legislature. We hope to see you there! We also wanted to tell you about why we're going.

photo from http://www.facebook.com/events/373281792720444/#!/events/373281792720444/
Slutwalk is not an event about women parading around wearing little clothing in the name of empowerment; Slutwalk is not even an exclusively female event. Though its conception was from the comments of one man about women, victim blaming affects all genders. Victim blaming is extremely prevalent in our culture, from people saying that saying that women dressed provocatively or drinking excessively are "asking for it," or inviting sexual assault. Also there are "rules" that tell women they shouldn't wear revealing clothing, should always watch their drink and should avoid certain areas and being alone. Then, if a woman is sexually assaulted, it is her fault for not following these "rules." How many teenage girls are told by their parents to watch their drink when they go to parties, and to always stay in pairs? (Devonne got this speech from her parents) Now how many teenage boys are told by their parents that they shouldn't be putting things in girls drinks? Or that "no means no" and that sexual contact without consent is always wrong? We don't think this conversation happens often if ever. Isn't there something wrong with this picture? Devonne isn't criticizing her parents for giving her this advice, in fact she follows it. If watching your drink and travelling in pairs will make you feel more comfortable and safe then by all means do it. What does deserve criticism however is the fact that our culture teaches women not to get raped but doesn't teach men not to rape. This is not only unfair but ineffective.

Photo by Francesca June, taken from http://www.artandsciencelab.com/
Before we get to far along, what exactly is sexual assault? Sexual assault is any form of sexual contact without voluntary consent. This can include forced kissing, fondling, vaginal or anal penetration, and oral sex. By this definition, there is no such thing as "asking for it" because it is non consensual. In North America, 1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime,  and 40% of those assaulted won't report the incident to police. 
Despite the widespread idea that the way women dress or act is a determining factor in their sexual assault, recent statistics have shown that this really isn't the case. 85% of sexual assaults are perpetrated by people known to the victim (StatsCan 1993), and 75% involve premeditation of some sort by the assailant.

Photo from facebook.com/PoliticalGutter
So clearly, our efforts to educate girls on "How Not to Get Raped" are ineffective against the majority of situations in which sexual assault occurs. Which then raises the question, why are we still teaching them? It's like teaching kids that the world is still flat when we know that it's round. Except that by teaching girls that it is their job to keep themselves from being raped, we inadvertently teach them that when they are raped it's their own fault. This is a huge part of why so many sexual assaults go unreported. Instead of creating campaigns where we tell women not to wear short skirts on the metro or campaigns where we tell women not to drink too much we need campaigns that define consent and tell people that sexual assault without consent is assault. The posters around the University of Alberta campus are a great example of this (see pictures below) as the focus on the definition of consent and the behaviour of perpetrators rather than of the potential victims. SAVE also has a great campaign.
http://www.sac.ualberta.ca/CreateChange.aspx
photo from http://www.sac.ualberta.ca/CreateChange.aspx








Victim blaming is not only very prevalent but it's extremely easy to do. When the topic of date rape came up at Devonne's work (due to a newspaper article someone had recently read) a female co-worker of hers said that if she ever found out Devonne was hanging out with "those kinds of boys" she would be in big trouble. Devonne didn't say anything about it at the time, but as she thought about it, she got kind of angry. Who exactly are "those kinds of boys?" Is there some flashing neon sign above their heads saying "DATE RAPIST" that she doesn't know about? Basically what this coworker is saying is that if Devonne some how missed the date rapist flags (and if you know what these are, please do tell,) it would be her fault and she would need to be punished. Because apparently being date raped wouldn't be punishment enough. As annoying as this was, it was most likely well-meaning. But this shows that there is a serious problem in that we believe that we need to lecture girls to not hang out with "those kinds of boys" rather than lecture boys about not being "those kinds of boys." It's not the offenders that would be in "big trouble," according to this coworker, it's the victims. And this coworker of Devonne's has an opinion that is shared by much of our society.

Slutwalk aims to raise awareness about this culture of victim blaming, and thereby end it. Once we start to teach not to rape, rather than to not get raped, we will be on the path to reducing the occurrences of sexual assaults. Whether someone is wearing a bra or a burqa, neither deserves to be raped. So if you agree that victim blaming is wrong, then please come to Edmonton's Slutwalk this Saturday. If you don't live in Edmonton, find out if there is one near you. If there isn't and you're feeling really ambitious, you could even start one yourself!

If you want more information on sexual assault you can visit www.ualberta.ca/sac or www.sac.ab.ca
Both the University of Alberta Sexual Assault Centre and the Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton offer support, information, and assistance to sexual assualt survivors and their supporters. The U of A Sexual Assault Centre provides drop-in or telephone crisis intervention and can be reached at 780-492-9771. The Sexual Assualt Centre of Edmonton operates a 24 hour crisis line at 780-423-4121.






Sunday 1 July 2012

Chris Brown, Domestic Violence, and Why Your Jokes Aren't Funny.

Warning! If you have struggled, or are struggling with domestic violence, this post may bring up unpleasant thoughts/memories. Please read at your own discretion.
By Claire

Domestic violence is no joke. When I hear a joke about domestic violence it makes me want to throw up. 
Violence isn’t funny, it’s not cool, it shouldn’t be used to sell a product, and it shouldn’t be made into entertainment. And it has no place in an intimate relationship.
I’ve never been in an abusive relationship, and (as far as I know) neither have any of my friends or family. But this is an issue that is extremely close to my heart.
I spent three months working at a transition house for women who were leaving abusive relationships. While I was there, I got an up close look at what domestic violence can do to a relationship, to a family, to a child, and to a woman. It rips families apart, it creates impossible monsters out of children, and it can reduce a woman to a shell of her former self. 
The organization I worked for tried to help change that. At our shelter, we had room for up to 10 women and 8 children (though at one point I’m pretty sure there were more- it was hard to keep track sometimes.) There, women and children could stay for up to one month (though they certainly wouldn’t kick anyone out onto the street,) and have almost everything taken care of. There were beds, food, a closet full of clothes because many of them women leave with only the clothes on their backs, childcare available for most of the day, a children’s councillor three days a week, and women’s councillors available 24/7. The people working at the shelter were incredibly dedicated to helping these women get back on their feet and start fresh. 
And while at points it was incredibly restorative to my faith in humanity to see women come to the shelter broken and leave not whole, but mending, it could be really hard. I would go home and as much as I would try to keep it from getting to me, some days it would. I couldn’t help but think how all of this could have been prevented if these husbands/fiancees/boyfriends/baby daddies/wives/girlfriends (yes, it happens in both hetero and homosexual couples) had just not hit them in the first place. 
But domestic abuse is not just hitting and physical violence; it can be emotional, mental, verbal. Certainly physical is the first to come to mind, perhaps because it is the most inherently dangerous. You cannot kill someone with your words, but you can kill someone with your fists. Your words could cause someone to kill themselves, though.
Domestic abuse is not an exclusively feminist issue. There are men who are abused by their wives/girlfriends/boyfriends/fiancees/husbands/partners, and often these men face more of a stigma in admitting they are victims, because our society teaches us that men should be strong, unfeeling, and, well, (for lack of a better word) manly.
But it is not a stretch to say that domestic violence affects a disproportionate number of women. On average in Canada a woman is killed every six days by a current or former partner. That was 67 women in 2009. Today, there is around 3000 women and 2500 children living in shelters. That’s equivalent to the number of people I would have if I tripled the size of my high school. Half of Canadian women have experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence since the age of 16. 
When will we stop and realize that these numbers are way too high and that enough is enough?
One of the most poignant moments for me is when I was doing my training, and we were given a character, and as a group, we had to go back and forth to various “places” (sheets of paper with “hospital,” “home,” “police station” etc. written on them and placed around the office) as we struggled to escape our abusive relationship. As in many real life situations, mine did not have a happy ending. My character was an immigrant woman, who spoke little English or French, and was eventually raped by her husband, resulting in a difficult pregnancy, complicated by the fact that she was constantly being sent from government agency to agency in the hopes that she could get some kind of assistance and leave her abusive husband. It ended with her heading back to her home, feeling hopeless and let down. It was incredibly eye opening because you could actually feel the frustration. If it was so maddening for me to be constantly walking from one end of the room to the other, how would it feel to be constantly going back and forth between people telling you “sorry, but I can’t help you?”
Domestic violence can be somewhat of a taboo topic in many cultures and societies. In many places in the world, it is still legal for a man to rape his wife. Here in our western society, domestic violence is somewhat less of a taboo topic, though it would seem that isn’t always a good thing. In my opinion, we have become uncomfortably comfortable with domestic violence. As long as it is not happening to us or our loved ones, we can’t be bothered to speak out against it, or not severe enough in our condoning of domestic violence. Which leads me to the eternal poster boy for domestic violence, Chris Brown. 
For those of you living under a rock, Chris Brown is a grammy-winning hip hop/R&B artist, who I actually think is really talented- more so than many of today’s popular artists. However, in 2009, the night before the Grammys, at which he and his then-girlfriend Rihanna were both scheduled to perform, he beat Rihanna so badly that she had to go to the hospital. 3 years, a felony assault and uttering threat charge, a couple hundred hours of community service, more than halfway through his five years of probation, and a completed course on domestic violence (I actually read in an article- I wish I could find it now- that some men who are required to take these courses can actually use the time to bond with each other and share tips on how best to hit their partners so that it won’t be noticed,) Brown was invited to perform at the 2012 Grammys. Clearly, people are more than willing to forget what Chris Brown did, and celebrate his successes. He released a song called “Look at Me Now” - can we just pause for a moment and consider how sick this is, in the context of his career slump being because HE FUCKING BEAT HIS GIRLFRIEND?- on an album that, although it won a Grammy, was unpopular with critics because of Brown’s perceived unwillingness to mature and learn from his mistakes. As Sasha Pasulka puts it, “I’m not ok with Chris Brown performing at the Grammys, and I’m not sure why you are.”
Chris Brown shows very little remorse for what he has done. He got off easy with a guilty plea, and avoided jail time. He hired a crisis management team to repair his image. 
He must have paid them well, since it would seem no one cares about his actions. We don’t have to forgive Chris Brown but it would seem that a lot of us are ready to anyways.
When someone with a lot of twitter followers points out that what Chris Brown did was wrong and that really he hasn’t done much to own up to it, they are promptly bombarded with messages from the so called “Team Breezy” (AKA the pseudostalker fans of Chris Brown) about how everyone should stop bring up things that happened in the past. During the Grammys this year here’s what Team Breezy was talking about on twitter. 
Um, excuse me? No, thank you, I will continue to boycott anything to do with Chris Brown, and I will do so until he is old and dead and rotting in a box in the ground. 
It is not ok that people are ok with him. I cannot stress this enough. It is not ok that (as Sasha Pasulka says in the article linked above) when Usher criticized Brown for what he did, Usher was delivered with so much hate from supporters of Chris Brown he had to apologize. Beyonce has plenty of kind words to say to Rihanna, and says them very well- but she says nothing to condemn Chris Brown. Oprah speaks more frankly about domestic violence in this clip (“he hit you once, he will hit you again,”) but she doesn’t say anything about Chris Brown. 
So few celebrities have actually spoken out about Chris Brown, and those who have are met bombarded with comments and replies that are often filled with not only hateful speech, but scarily violent vitriol. No person (not even Chris Brown) deserves that. 
Though Rihanna has gone on to have considerable success after being abused (as many women do) I think it makes it easier for us all to brush it off, to be content with “well, it obviously wasn’t that bad, look at her now.” As much as I wish that Rihanna had taken the opportunity to speak up for battered women everywhere, I respect her decision to put it behind her and to move on. She has no obligation whatsoever to become a spokesperson for domestic violence. As empowering for abused women everywhere to see that they’re not alone and that domestic violence touches everyone, from all walks of life, as it would have been to see and hear Rihanna speak out, she cannot be blamed for wanting to move on with her life. If I could do one thing to fix this mess, I wish that Rihanna would never have to have her name dragged into this again, and I wish that no one would ever see the police photo of her after she was beaten. 
I know it sounds like I’m just beaking on Chris Brown here, but you have to understand that he is a visible representation of all men who beat women. These men are not usually so prominent in our media- I’m not arguing for public shaming to become a regular practice with criminals, but it would be nice if people made Chris Brown remember what he did. Because when he’s swaggering on stages all over the world singing “Look at Me Now,” from his album F.A.M.E.,I’m not sure that he does.
If we do hear about an abuser, it is often after he has been killed by his victim. Recently in Eastern Canada, there is an ongoing case before the courts about a woman who is facing charges of conspiring to commit murder after allegedly trying to hire a hit man (an undercover RCMP officer) to kill her abusive husband. What is being decided in this case will set precedent for other cases of abused wives who kill their husbands as a last resort, in self-defense, or as a result of battered woman syndrome
This can be quite a polarizing issue, and I’m not 100% sure where I personally stand. I believe that it is fundamentally wrong to harm another human being. So the question is, who is more in the wrong, if both parties are both guilty of a heinous crime?
I think my proposed solution would be to aim for prevention- make it easier for women to leave, put more funding into shelters like the one I worked at, where women are able to start fresh after leaving, and to increase awareness about domestic violence, its warning signs, and how to help someone who is being abused. And if all this fails, and a woman believes she truly has no other way out, and is in danger every day, she must do what she believes she must do. Is all the years of abuse at the hands of the person you’re supposed to be able to trust most not punishment enough?
At the very core of this problem is the subjugation of woman in society. Some men, it would seem, have an insatiable need to feel strong, dominant and powerful, and some do that by exerting power over their wives, girlfriends, etc. Violence breeds violence, and in turn children that have grown up in a home where domestic violence takes place are more likely to either perpetrate it (if they are male) or be victims of it (if they are female.) 
We need to stop the cycle of violence in its tracks and teach our children that it is neither ok to hit or to be hit. We also need to talk more about the subject of domestic violence and tell our friends and family that it’s ok if they need to reach out for help at some point and that there is always a way out. I commend TV programs such as “Criminal Minds” and “Glee,” for covering the topic of domestic violence, regardless of how trivially it was done. On “Glee,” for example, I was disappointed that when the topic was first brought up it was used as a “C” storyline, and wasn’t dealt with with a lot of complexity, but I am glad that they didn’t show the storyline being wrapped up nice and tight with a happy ending and instead showed (spoiler alert) Coach Beiste going back to her abusive husband, because that is what really happens. Many women have to try multiple times before they leave for good, whether it’s because they go back to their abusers on their own, because they are not financially independent, or whether their abuser drags them back, or any other of many possible reasons. That is, if concerns about finances, their children, and safety aren’t enough. 
Domestic violence can be attributed partially to the rigid gender roles our society forces us to adhere to. The majority of abusers are men, who as young boys are taught that “boys don’t cry,” “real men don’t show emotions,” etc. All of this leads boys and men to bottle their emotions, not showing them and keeping everything inside, to themselves. Because boys and young men are not taught how to properly express and deal with normal, human emotions (including anger) this can often manifest itself as violence. This is clearly demonstrated by the cycle of abuse in an intimate relationship, where at first, there is a “honeymoon” period, where everything is fine and dandy, the man will be kind, attentive, loving and constantly showering the woman with affection and often gifts. Then, tension will slowly build, with the woman usually walking on eggshells, doing everything the man tells her to because she is afraid of the repercussions if she doesn’t.  Eventually, the ticking time bomb that is the abuser will explode, usually into a bout of physical violence. After that, he will cycle back to the “honey moon phase” leading to the woman telling herself numerous mantras of “he didn’t mean it, he was just drunk,” “if I hadn’t left the house such a mess, he wouldn’t have been angry,” “he’s just having a tough time at work, things will get better soon.” As much as we all would like to believe that these things are true, they’re probably not. As time carries on, the violent episodes will become more frequent, and the honeymoon phases will become shorter. When the violence ends, it will probably end in one of three ways; she leaves, she kills him or he kills her. Not many of these outcomes have happy endings. 
Domestic violence is not funny, it’s not okay, and the people who make jokes about it are not funny, and they are not cool. I’m not okay with anyone hitting anyone else, and I’m not okay with people getting away with crimes that deserve harsher punishment. Clearly, the justice system and society have failed Chris Brown and it has probably failed other men who beat their partners too. So, I implore you; don’t buy Chris Brown’s record. Don’t watch his videos on youtube. Unfollow his twitter and unlike his Facebook. And if you know of a woman that is being abused, or have suspicions, say something. Don’t be an innocent bystander-call the police, call local shelters and hotlines for advice, and pass on the information to the victim. 
For more information you can visit http://www.transitionhouse.net, http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/ , http://www.acws.ca/, or search “women’s shelter [name of your location]” in your favourite search engine. If you are trying to leave an abusive relationship, be sure to cover your tracks, by either clearing your history or using incognito features on your internet browser.
Sources: