Thursday 28 June 2012

Stop Stalking, Stop Shopping, and Start Reading

By Devonne

I spend too much time on the internet. When I'm bored or when I'm procrastinating, I creep people's facebook profiles, I shop online, or I peruse Pinterest. If you're anything like me (and I know I'm not the only one), I have some ideas for you. I'm not suggesting that you give up facebook stalking, gossip sites, or Etsy. I just think there's an argument to be made for sites that are a little more intellectual, don't make you feel guilty afterwards (I have a serious fear that I will accidentally like something and someone will find out I've creeped their profile), and won't cause your paycheque to dissapear. Thus I've decided to devote today's blog post to other blogs/websites. Sites that are pro-feminist (even if they don't explicit call themselves a feminist site) and are too fantastic for me not to share with you. So here is my list of the top four sites you can visit when you're bored, procrastinating, or pretending to work:

1.       www.feministing.com

Feministing is awesome. It’s a feminist blog but with a lot of different bloggers so there’s multiple posts daily. They post on every feminist issue imaginable – they discuss politics, movies, books, body image, LGBTQ rights, racism, you name it. Most posts are very journalistic, they read like newspaper editorials. It’s probably the most informative feminist site I’ve come across. They cover a lot of US politics in particular, but they also do some really great analysis of popular books and TV shows from a feminist perspective. If you haven’t visited Feministing yet, you are seriously missing out.

2.       www.flurtsite.com

Flurt is an Edmonton project that includes both a printed magazine and a website. I had the opportunity to go to their magazine launch party last weekend and I picked up a copy while I was there. The magazine was cool, and included some interesting pieces but what I got more excited about was their website (which I checked out as soon as I got home). It’s basically like a feminist Cosmo. While they do have articles regarding political topics and activism, it’s more lighthearted than Feministing. They have sections on Sex and Dating, Entertainment, Lifestyle, etc. I also really like that it’s a local venture. Feministing covers a lot of US news and I do think that US politics are interesting and relevant. However, it is great to read a Canadian viewpoint and hear about activism that is actually happening in my city.



Feminism + Ryan Gosling. It’s kinda my ideal combination. Basically a Gender Studies student started a tumblr with pictures of Ryan Gosling saying (imagined) feminist things. Is Ryan Gosling actually a feminist? I don’t really know. He has said and done things that could be considered feminist but honestly that’s beside the point. The tumblr is hilarious and a way to feel intellectual while staring at Ryan Gosling’s face. It shows that feminism can be fun which is important to keep in mind after a Fox News clip posted on Feministing has just made your blood boil. Also, this tumblr made me realize that guys discussing feminism is seriously attractive. Any guy who wants to talk patriarchy is going to have me enamoured pretty quickly even if he doesn’t look like Ryan Gosling. Although it wouldn’t hurt if he did look like Ryan Gosling.

*  Feminist Ryan Gosling is now a book! Which I just pre-ordered off of Amazon because I am super cool.I also impulse bought the Miss Representation DVD at the same time because it is the best movie ever.   And everyone should be required by law to see it. #kiddingnotkidding

4.       www.hellogiggles.com

This self-proclaimed “ladyblogging” site was co-founded by Zoey Deschanel. Which in my opinion, is all the reason you need to go check it out. But if Zoey Deschanel’s coolness isn’t enough to convince you, I’ll give it my best shot. Hello Giggles is a website run by creative, fun, and intelligent women and in between the sections on cute animals and nail art is some really great cultural critique (see the Social Studies section). The site appears to be aimed at tweens, and Zoey describes it as a place for young girls to see strong female role models. It’s kind of like a younger version of Flurt, fun stuff mixed in with the serious but without all the reviews of sex toys (I like Flurt a lot but I don’t know if it was necessary to have an entire section on vibrators). If I had a little sister, I’d definitely introduce her to Hello Giggles and I’ll probably visit the site myself from time to time as well.

Thursday 21 June 2012

Why You Should Get Yourself Into A Women's Studies Class ASAP

By Devonne

A little over a year ago I was creating my first year university schedule. I was looking for another elective and thus was browsing the course catalogue when I saw that my school offered Women’s Studies. It sounded interesting and it fit my schedule so I registered. I didn’t know anybody who had taken Women’s Studies and the course description was vague so I really didn’t know what to expect. Within the first week I knew that it was my favourite course. I was in love with Women’s Studies. I would eagerly sit down each week to do my assigned reading because the articles were so interesting it didn’t even feel like school. When the semester finished I couldn’t bear the thought of not having Women’s Studies so I dropped a course I didn’t need so I could take another Women’s Studies course. I was hooked.

I had always been a feminist. I knew that a feminist was someone who believed in equality between men and women and I wasn’t afraid to identify as a feminist. And I wasn’t under any illusions that women had reached full equality. I was aware there was a wage gap, I knew that women were underrepresented in politics, and I knew that there was something wrong with the fact that my mom does 80% of the housework even though both my parents have full time jobs. I also knew deep down inside that my beloved Disney princesses were pretty crappy role models for girls. What I didn’t know was that what my mom was doing was called “The Second Shift” and that this is a widespread situation that was far more complicated (and sexist) than I had thought. I didn’t know why women were so underrepresented in politics. And it turns out that Disney princesses are even worse than I thought (I still secretly like them though. We just have a complicated relationship now). As for sexism in the English language? Gender stratification? Female Chauvinist Pigs? These were things I was surrounded by but had never even thought about before. That’s what happens when you take Women’s Studies. The whole world looks different to you. And while that sounds like a bad thing (because you’re suddenly seeing sexism that you used to just ignore) it’s really a good thing. Because once you identify a problem you can try to change it.

I loved a lot of the courses I took this year. I am super passionate about Ancient Rome. I could talk about the Romans for hours, really I could. The difference between the courses I found interesting and Women’s Studies is that Women’s Studies is applicable to my whole life. The things I learned there will affect how I vote in elections, the type of person I can date, and how I envision my future. It also leads to really awesome discussions between my friends and I (and not just female friends!). I’ve had so many great conversations with my mother about things I was studying in my Women’s Studies class. Like I mentioned earlier, I’ve always been a feminist. Now it’s a part of my identity in a way it never was before and it’s all because of Women’s Studies.

I know that by this time of year most students have already picked their courses for next year. I also know that there’s plenty of time to drop and add courses. So if you are a university student my words of advice to you would be get yourself into a Women’s Studies class ASAP. People are really hesitant about Women’s  Studies courses (ex. my friends). I think there are some misconceptions about them which I will be thrilled to clear up for you all.

Myth #1: Women’s Studies courses are taken by crazy, butch, lesbians. People really do think this. My prime example being my father who frequently asked me questions like “have you bought some combat boots to wear to your Women’s Studies class?”. I feel like if you still have this stereotype of what a feminist looks like you probably aren’t reading this blog, but just for the record this is not true at all. Most people in intro Women’s Studies classes were just like me, they took it because it sounded intriguing and it conveniently fit their schedule. They came from various faculties (not just Arts) and I haven’t a clue what their sexual orientations were (nor do I care) but I would presume the percentage of lesbians isn’t any higher than the average course.  

Myth #2: Only women can take Women’s Studies. I’m not going to lie, both my Women’s Studies classes were mostly girls. But neither class was all female. Men can and do take Women’s Studies. We had one guy in my 201 class who was from Engineering and didn’t even know what the word feminism meant when he got there. To quote bell hooks “Feminism is for Everybody”!

Myth #3: Women’s Studies only talks about women and feminism. I can’t speak for all programs but my courses also talked about constructions of masculinity, heterosexism, racism, and classicism. It was a lot more diverse in curriculum than I had anticipated.

Myth #4: It’s an “opinion course” and thus you can’t properly test the material. I can see how one might think Women’s Studies courses consist of your prof ranting about her personal opinions but it’s not like that (that would be this blog). Terminology is not opinion and feminist history is not opinion. As for the articles we read in class, we weren’t being tested on whether we agreed or not with the author. What was important was that we understood the author’s argument so we could explain it on a test.

Women’s Studies might sound obscure but in truth it’s offered at a lot of universities. I know for sure that it is offered at the University of Alberta, the University of Toronto (it’s called Women’s and Gender Studies) and Queens (it’s called Gender Studies). And yes, I just spent ten minutes looking at U of T and Queen’s websites just so I could say that. I personally am a U of A student so if you go there and have any questions about the difference between 101 and 201 or want prof recommendations I’d be happy to help you out. Just e-mail ThisIsaFeministIssue@gmail.com.

Saturday 16 June 2012

The V Word

By Devonne

Feminists love the word “vagina”. Seriously, feminists say “vagina” about as often as junior high girls say “like”.  So here’s my omg-I’m-such-a-bad-feminist-confession:  I don’t think I’ve ever said the word vagina out loud. However, the absence of the word vagina from my vocabulary is really not that shocking given that I refer to my bras as “undergarments” and have only recently begun saying the word “tampon”. Before you assume that I had some sort of prudish upbringing you should know that my own mother had a laughing fit when I made her order my drink for me because I was too shy to say “Sex on the Beach”. I’d like to be clear – I do not think female anatomy, menstruation, or sex is shameful. Talking like I’m from the Victorian era is just who I am. I have no idea why I talk the way I do. Maybe I read too much historical fiction when I was younger, maybe I spent too much time with my grandmother as a child. My strange word choices extend beyond the realm of womanhood – ex.  I’m more likely to say “This is greatly distressing me” than “This is pissing me off”. Sometimes my terminology is rather comical – I was having a discussion with my friends about STIs and referred to one’s “potential lover” instead of “sexual partner” because I thought it sounded better (my friends actually found the word “lover” more embarrassing than “sexual partner).  I’m trying to become less easily shocked (note I say “shocked” not “offended” because I’ve never found these words offensive as long as they’re being used in the right context) seeing as feminist articles tend to use blunter language than I’m used to.

 However, when I read that Lisa Brown, a state representative in Michigan recently got banned from the House for saying “vagina” during a debate on abortion , I was shocked. And I wasn’t shocked by her word choice, I was shocked because the banning was completely and utterly ridiculous. Basically Michigan is in the process of passing a new anti-abortion bill that bans all abortions after 20 weeks and allows no exceptions for women’s health. Naturally some of the female representatives do not support this bill and are speaking up. Rep. Lisa Brown’s speech was really great, she argues that the new anti-choice legislation actually infringes on her religious freedom as she’s Jewish and Jewish law requires abortion if the pregnant woman is at risk. This is interesting considering a lot of anti-abortionists use their religious beliefs as their argument for why women shouldn’t have a choice (because giving someone else choices would obviously infringe on one’s religious freedoms. Not.) Then Rep. Brown cleverly wrapped up her speech by telling the house "I'm flattered that you're all so interested in my vagina, but no means no." How dare she mention a part of the female body while having a debate about what females can and cannot do with their bodies! As someone who is usually uncomfortable with the word “vagina” let me get a few things straight:

1.       Vagina is not a crude or vulgar word. It’s a medically accurate word used to describe a part of the female body. And yes, if you’re using it in a certain context (like making a vulgar joke) then that might make some people uncomfortable (including myself) and probably wouldn’t be appropriate in a government setting. However, if you’re using it to refer to female anatomy during a debate on the female body then that’s totally appropriate and professional. It would not be offensive if a doctor used said vagina, nor should it be offensive in a debate on women’s bodies.

2.       It’s actually rather immature to not say vagina if that is what you’re discussing. When discussing trans-vaginal ultrasounds (you know that totally medically unnecessary thing where they probe women’s vaginas before they get an abortion just to violate them) , Virginia politician David Albo referred to it as Trans-V. So he’s totally uncomfortable saying vagina but is completely okay with legislating on them.

I think Rep. Lisa Brown put it best herself when she said “What word should I have said?". I mean honestly, there are lots of other words for vagina but they’re either slang words that would have sounded vulgar or they’re silly terms that would have made her sound like a little girl.

I’m really sick of politicians who want to legislate on women’s bodies but are completely terrified of the female body. I’m also sick of women being left out or silenced out of these debates. They didn’t want to hear from Rep. Lisa Brown because she was pro-choice so they simply banned her from the debate. They also banned Rep. Barb Byrum for speaking out of turn (which is technically a reason to get banned, but reps speak out of turn all the time from what I hear and they don’t usually get the book thrown at them). Regardless of your views on abortion, silencing voices is not the way to have a discussion. Even if the citizens of Michigan disagree with Brown and Byrum’s views they should be upset that they have legislators who are being unfairly treated. I know if I was one of their constituents I would be angry that my representative was unable to weigh in. This is reminiscent of how earlier this year Republicans had a discussion on birth control, with no women at it. And when Sandra Fluke (a college student) tried to express her opinions on why women should have access to birth control, she got called a slut.

Personally I think the debates on abortion and birth control were dealt with decades ago and to reopen them is extremely regressive. However, if you want to have a debate, have a real debate with fair representation. And that means pro-choice female politicians have a right to speak and to talk about the female body without being told to sit down and shut up and it means that educated young women like Sandra Fluke have the right to express their opinions without being ridiculed or slut-shamed.

I just went from never using the word vagina to using it over a dozen times in this post. I guess that’s what happens when my inner feminist becomes “greatly distressed”.

Friday 15 June 2012

Could We Please Be Spared Your Fear of My Period?


By Claire

Our local paper has a regular feature called the “Venting” column. It is compiled of comments that readers submit that range in subject to construction in our city, to weather, to the occasional uplifting story about a random act of kindness. Most of the time, I enjoy reading this column because the “vents” selected for the published issue are generally funny, thought-provoking or sarcastically witty. A couple weeks ago, however, mixed in with a comments about how the twist tie on a bag of bread always goes missing, to one begging that feminism not be used as a dirty word (such is the case with the term “femininazi”) there was this;
“Could we please be spared of the pleasure of tampon commercials during the evening news?”
At first, I was annoyed. Then, I was a little pissed. And so it progressed; the more I thought about it, the angrier I became.
Why shouldn’t they play tampon commercials during the evening news? I can think of no clear answer. Maybe that’s because I am a woman, one who bleeds every month as a painful (literally) reminder of the fact that I can bear children, that I have this view. Vents are posted anonymously, but if I’m being honest, I assumed that this venter was a middle aged man, though in all fairness, it could have been a woman.
But really, why are we so afraid of tampons?
Yes, tampons can be bad for the environment. I would imagine that even in a society such as ours that creates an insurmountable amount of trash, disposable feminine hygiene products make up a notable portion of our landfill waste. I mean sure, there are alternatives to disposable products, such as washable, reusable cloth pads, and products like the “Diva Cup,” which is a silicone or rubber cup that is inserted into the vagina during menstruation, and collects the menstrual flow, rather than absorbing it. Also, tampons have been known to cause T.S.S. (Toxic Shock Syndrome) when they are used improperly. And yes, there are the concerned parents of teenage daughters that believe wearing tampons will “devirginize” their daughters, thus making them impure and dirty. That’s a whole other argument.
But besides that, what is really wrong with tampons? And why was this person so opposed to seeing a commercial for them during the evening news?
I am morally opposed to bottled water. I think that it is a corrupt industry that sees an opportunity to exploit something necessary for survival, that should be available to everyone equally, I think that the idea of using a plastic bottle once and then throwing it away (recycling doesn’t change the fact that in buying that bottle of water, that piece of plastic will stay on this earth forever, not decomposing and going back to a natural state) is incredibly wasteful, and they, Nestle in particular recently began showing a commercial which is distinctly misogynistic. I could go on, but this is not a post about how I hate bottled water. The point is, that I don’t complain when they show bottled water commercials (ones that aren’t sexist, anyways) during the evening news. I respect that other consumers do not have the same moral opposition I do to bottled water, I understand the advertiser’s aim of appealing to those consumers, and persuade those consumers to buy their product. I’m sorry, but how are tampons any different? Oh right, only women need them.
Maybe I would be a little bit more understanding if feminine hygiene product commercials were different. But right now, they’re women sauntering around wearing white clothing or bathing suits, telling us how much fun they’re having on their periods. I applaud Kotex for coming out with commercials that highlight how ridiculous these advertisements are, because they are completely and truly absurd. Only the bravest and most courageous (and most confident in the performance of her tampon, pad, or menstrual cup) of women would wear white pants while she was on her period, particularly if it was a heavy flow day. Hello, haven’t these ad execs ever heard of period pants? When I’m on my period, I get the cramps, and I have a heavy flow. Do I really want to be wearing tight white pants on a day like that? Fuck no. On days like that, I’m wearing my darkest, comfiest and oldest sweatpants, usually with my black spandex shorts underneath for an added layer of protection. If I’m going to work, where the dress code of my office says “no sweats,” I’m wearing my comfiest pair of jeans. With my spandex shorts of course.
Not only do the ads show women looking unrealistically happy and beautiful (not to say that there are women who can’t look lovely and happy and pretty when they’re on their periods, but I can safely say that none of my friends walk around like that when they’re on their periods,) but we are subjected to demonstrations of their product with dyed blue liquids. As the girl in the U by Kotex commercial says “the ads on TV are really helpful, ‘cause they use that blue liquid and I’m like ‘oh! That’s what’s supposed to happen!’”
I’m sorry, what? Are we so afraid of mentioning what actually happens during a woman’s period that we have to use different coloured liquids?
So I really don’t see why this person is objecting to tampon commercials. Maybe, if they showed fake blood being squirted violently at a tampon or a pad, then maybe I would understand. But with how ridiculous the advertisements are, I am left with the questions, what the fucking fuck is wrong?
And would this commenter be so concerned if they showed the Victoria’s Secret commercials, which show women parading around in their underwear, were shown instead? I am inclined to believe not. 
We live in a culture that is so completely ok with the objectification of women’s bodies (whether natural or surgically enhanced) but is so completely uncomfortable with talking about a natural bodily function. One that allows us all to exist, I might add.
So the larger question here, is why are we so afraid of discussing what happens “down there” once a month? I read a fabulous article on the Huffington Post just this week, while I was pretending to work. Basically, it talks about a new ad campaign that pictures women going about their everyday business with blood running down their legs. Which, if you think about it, is completely natural. No, I don’t want to walk around with menstrual flow staining my shorts and dripping down my legs (I mean, if you get a nosebleed you try and stop it from going everywhere, right?) but it provokes an interesting thought; why are we not ok with this? Because we aren’t. If you want to view the images, you first have to confirm that you are above 18 years of age. So you have to be older than 18 to view women getting their period, but typically girls get their period between the ages of 11 and 14. How does that make sense? Yes, asking you to say that you’re over 18 on the internet means almost nothing in an age where five year olds are computer savvy, but the notion that we have to ask is puzzling to me.
When I was in junior high, and had just started getting my period I came upon a terrifying conundrum; it was early June, and we were required, for gym class, to go swimming. If you didn’t participate and didn’t have a note exempting you signed by either your parent or a doctor, you were docked marks. Trying desperately to be the best student I could (which isn’t to do in gym class when you’re growing into your body and have the coordination and athletic skills of Bambi when he first learned to walk) I was terrified by the prospect of having to talk to my teacher and to explain to her that I couldn’t go swimming because I (who had not yet discovered tampons, which allow you much more freedom than a conventional pad, might I add,) gulp, was… on my period. So, I asked my mom to write me a note. My mother is not one to allow her children to take the easy way out, and would of course never allow me an out simply because I didn’t want to go swimming, so she asked for a reason. I uncomfortably told her I was on my period. She wrote me the note, and then came home with some tampons.
So I can’t pretend like I never hid my period, that I wave my tampons around like flags of my womanhood. Even just the other week, when I was working in a different office, out in a fire hall, surrounded by middle aged men, I hid my tampon in my bra while I walked from my office to the bathroom. I know why I did it; I didn’t want to be looked at funny, I didn’t want my semi-misogynistic supervisor (who tore down his pin up calendar when I walked into his office and was weirded out by my reading Ariel Levy’s Female Chauvinist Pigs- a fabulous read, by the way-) to start treating me weirdly because it was my “time of the month.” Whether or not any of this would have actually happened, I don’t know. But next month, I will not hide my tampon in my bra, I will carry it in my hand, the way one would carry a document to the photocopier. Not like I’m showing it off (because face it, my tampon is not worth showing off, it’s about to be shoved into my vagina) but normally. Like it’s no big deal (which it isn’t.) Because I realize that there is nothing wrong with my tampon. There is something wrong with people who have a problem with my tampon.  

Welcome to This is a Feminist Issue

Hello there!

Welcome to our feminist blog! Before you run screaming in the other direction because I used the F word, let's establish what that commonly miscontrued word actually means. Feminism is defined as being the movement for social, political and economic equality between men and women. See that's not so scary is it? By this definition, we've technically always been feminists. Only recently have we realized just how far from equality women truly are. 
The origins of this blog began with late night text messages/essays between two friends ranting about Feminist Issues. These messages quickly turned into conversations too long for text. And too witty and too important to not have an audience (not to toot our own horns.)
Clearly, we needed a blog.
"We" are Devonne and Claire; two young, cosmopolitan (by Alberta standards) feminists. We are relatively new to the feminist movement; Devonne was introduced through her Women's Studies classes at univeristy, Claire got into feminism while working at a shelter for battered women (and hearing about all the fun Devonne was having in her classes.) Though we have similar visions and goals for the future, some of our views and perspectives can be quite different.
This blog is basically things that make us mad, or things that we think are worth sharing.
Though our audience will probably be small (meaning our moms and our bff Rayna) the issue of modern feminism is not.
As Tavi Gevinson put it, "feminism [is] not a rulebook, but a discussion." Our purpose here is not to act as the authority on anything, but to inspire civil discourse and encourage everyone (not just women) to think critically about the world around them.
In case you haven't guessed, we love discussion so feel free to comment or contact us with any questions you have! Aside from getting angry about feminist issues, we're really nice girls, we promise.

Claire and Devonne